[v1.05][ARM] Add support for Kirin 9000S and TSV120

This commit is contained in:
Dr-Noob
2024-07-28 16:37:07 +01:00
parent 260f9ec3b8
commit 483f663382
4 changed files with 9 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@@ -167,6 +167,7 @@ bool match_google(char* soc_name, struct system_on_chip* soc) {
// https://www.techinsights.com/
// https://datasheetspdf.com/pdf-file/1316605/HiSilicon/Hi3660/1
// https://github.com/Dr-Noob/cpufetch/issues/259
bool match_hisilicon(char* soc_name, struct system_on_chip* soc) {
char* tmp;
@@ -204,6 +205,7 @@ bool match_hisilicon(char* soc_name, struct system_on_chip* soc) {
SOC_EQ(tmp, "hi3680", "980", SOC_HISILICON_3680, soc, 7)
//SOC_EQ(tmp, "?", "985", SOC_KIRIN, soc, 7)
SOC_EQ(tmp, "hi3690", "990", SOC_HISILICON_3690, soc, 7)
SOC_EQ(tmp, "kirin9000s", "9000s", SOC_HISILICON_9000S,soc, 7)
SOC_END
}

View File

@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ enum {
SOC_HISILICON_3670,
SOC_HISILICON_3680,
SOC_HISILICON_3690,
SOC_HISILICON_9000S,
// Kunpeng //
SOC_KUNPENG_920,
SOC_KUNPENG_930,
@@ -377,7 +378,7 @@ enum {
inline static VENDOR get_soc_vendor_from_soc(SOC soc) {
if(soc >= SOC_BCM_2835 && soc <= SOC_BCM_2712) return SOC_VENDOR_BROADCOM;
else if(soc >= SOC_HISILICON_3620 && soc <= SOC_HISILICON_3690) return SOC_VENDOR_KIRIN;
else if(soc >= SOC_HISILICON_3620 && soc <= SOC_HISILICON_9000S) return SOC_VENDOR_KIRIN;
else if(soc >= SOC_KUNPENG_920 && soc <= SOC_KUNPENG_930) return SOC_VENDOR_KUNPENG;
else if(soc >= SOC_EXYNOS_3475 && soc <= SOC_EXYNOS_880) return SOC_VENDOR_EXYNOS;
else if(soc >= SOC_MTK_MT6893 && soc <= SOC_MTK_MT8783) return SOC_VENDOR_MEDIATEK;

View File

@@ -202,8 +202,10 @@ struct uarch* get_uarch_from_midr(uint32_t midr, struct cpuInfo* cpu) {
CHECK_UARCH(arch, cpu, 'C', 0x0AF, NA, NA, "ThunderX2 99XX", UARCH_THUNDERX2, CPU_VENDOR_CAVIUM)
CHECK_UARCH(arch, cpu, 'H', 0xD01, NA, NA, "TaiShan v110", UARCH_TAISHAN_V110, CPU_VENDOR_HUAWEI) // Kunpeng 920 series
CHECK_UARCH(arch, cpu, 'H', 0xD02, 2, 2, "TaiShan v120", UARCH_TAISHAN_V120, CPU_VENDOR_HUAWEI) // Kiring 9000S Big cores (https://github.com/Dr-Noob/cpufetch/issues/259)
CHECK_UARCH(arch, cpu, 'H', 0xD02, NA, NA, "TaiShan v200", UARCH_TAISHAN_V200, CPU_VENDOR_HUAWEI) // Kunpeng 930 series (found in openeuler: https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/XQCV7NX2UKRIUWUFKRF4PO3QENCOUFR3)
CHECK_UARCH(arch, cpu, 'H', 0xD40, NA, NA, "Cortex-A76", UARCH_CORTEX_A76, CPU_VENDOR_ARM) // Kirin 980 Big/Medium cores -> Cortex-A76
CHECK_UARCH(arch, cpu, 'H', 0xD42, NA, NA, "TaiShan v120", UARCH_TAISHAN_V120, CPU_VENDOR_HUAWEI) // Kiring 9000S Small Cores (https://github.com/Dr-Noob/cpufetch/issues/259)
CHECK_UARCH(arch, cpu, 'N', 0x000, NA, NA, "Denver", UARCH_DENVER, CPU_VENDOR_NVIDIA)
CHECK_UARCH(arch, cpu, 'N', 0x003, NA, NA, "Denver2", UARCH_DENVER2, CPU_VENDOR_NVIDIA)
@@ -325,6 +327,7 @@ int get_number_of_vpus(struct cpuInfo* cpu) {
case UARCH_ICESTORM: // [https://dougallj.github.io/applecpu/icestorm-simd.html]
case UARCH_BLIZZARD: // [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_ARM_processors]
case UARCH_TAISHAN_V110:// [https://www-file.huawei.com/-/media/corp2020/pdf/publications/huawei-research/2022/huawei-research-issue1-en.pdf]: "128-bit x 2 for single precision"
case UARCH_TAISHAN_V120:// Not confirmed, asssuming same as v110
case UARCH_TAISHAN_V200:// Not confirmed, asssuming same as v110
case UARCH_CORTEX_A57: // [https://www.anandtech.com/show/8718/the-samsung-galaxy-note-4-exynos-review/5]
case UARCH_CORTEX_A72: // [https://www.anandtech.com/show/10347/arm-cortex-a73-artemis-unveiled/2]

View File

@@ -83,7 +83,9 @@ enum {
UARCH_BRAHMA_B15,
UARCH_BRAHMA_B53,
UARCH_XGENE, // Applied Micro X-Gene.
// HUAWEI
UARCH_TAISHAN_V110, // HiSilicon TaiShan v110
UARCH_TAISHAN_V120, // HiSilicon TaiShan v120
UARCH_TAISHAN_V200, // HiSilicon TaiShan v200
// PHYTIUM
UARCH_XIAOMI, // Not to be confused with Xiaomi Inc