[1.04][ARM] Improve robustness in Raspberry Pi detection

This commit is contained in:
Dr-Noob
2023-10-01 11:49:20 +02:00
parent 44e5e1b6dc
commit b17df01958

View File

@@ -698,7 +698,13 @@ int hex2int(char c) {
return -1;
}
// https://www.raspberrypi.org/documentation/hardware/raspberrypi/revision-codes/README.md
/*
* https://www.raspberrypi.com/documentation/computers/raspberry-pi.html#raspberry-pi-revision-codes:
* NOTE: As of the 4.9 kernel, all Raspberry Pi computers report BCM2835, even those with BCM2836,
* BCM2837 and BCM2711 processors. You should not use this string to detect the processor. Decode the
* revision code using the information below.
* https://www.raspberrypi.com/documentation/computers/raspberry-pi.html#new-style-revision-codes-in-use
*/
struct system_on_chip* guess_soc_raspbery_pi(struct system_on_chip* soc) {
char* revision = get_revision_from_cpuinfo();
@@ -714,22 +720,19 @@ struct system_on_chip* guess_soc_raspbery_pi(struct system_on_chip* soc) {
int arr_size = ARRAY_SIZE(soc_rpi_string);
int pppp = hex2int(revision[2]);
if(pppp == -1) {
printErr("[RPi] Found invalid RPi PPPP code: %s", revision[2]);
if(pppp < 0) {
printBug("[RPi] Found invalid RPi PPPP code: %s", pppp);
return soc;
}
if(pppp > arr_size) {
printErr("[RPi] Found invalid RPi PPPP code: %d while max is %d", pppp, arr_size);
if(pppp > arr_size-1) {
printBug("[RPi] Found invalid RPi PPPP code: %d (max is %d)", pppp, arr_size-1);
return soc;
}
char* soc_raw_name = soc_rpi_string[pppp];
/*int soc_len = strlen(soc_raw_name);
soc->raw_name = emalloc(sizeof(char) * (soc_len + 1));
strncpy(soc->raw_name, soc_raw_name, soc_len + 1);*/
match_broadcom(soc_raw_name, soc);
return soc;
}
@@ -812,7 +815,7 @@ struct system_on_chip* get_soc(void) {
if(isRPi) {
soc = guess_soc_raspbery_pi(soc);
if(soc->soc_vendor == SOC_VENDOR_UNKNOWN) {
printWarn("SoC detection failed using revision code");
printErr("[RPi] SoC detection failed using revision code, falling back to cpuinfo detection");
}
else {
return soc;